Monday, 6 April 2015

Deadly extent of common food poisoning bacterium revealed by Tim Sandle

The biggest cause of food poisoning globally is the bacterium Bacillus cereus. New research suggests that the organism is more deadly than realized: the bacterium can produce 19 different variants of its harmful toxin.
A recent study has shown that Bacillus cereus can produce 19 different variants of its poison; a poison that causes nausea and vomiting. This finding explains why some cases of food poisoning from this bacterium are benign whilst others can result in death.
Bacillus cereus is most commonly found in soil. It can survive extreme environments by being able to form hardy spores. In terms of food poisoning it is associated with the so-termed "fried rice syndrome", given that food poisoning cases from this organism are contracted from fried rice dishes that have been sitting at room temperature for hours. Because the bacterium can produce spores, if it grows from long enough, then reheating the rice is not sufficient and the food remains at risk.
The toxins from the bacterium can cause two types of illness: one type characterized by diarrhea and the other, called emetic toxin, by nausea and vomiting. The toxin attacks the membrane of living cells. Food poisoning results from this toxin production in the gastrointestinal tract.
By developing a method, based on mass spectrometry, to analyse scientists based at the Technische Universität München (TUM) and the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, have now discovered that the toxin comes in 19 variants. This is related to variations in chemical structure.
Other than being of scientific interest, the research could be medically important. The research could be an important starting point for the accurate detection of the toxic bacteria.
The findings have been published in the journal Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. The research paper is headed “Chemodiversity of cereulide, the emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus.”


Source:

14th Asean Food Conference in Pasay City, Phillipines (24-26 June 2015)


The ASEAN Food Conference (AFC) program is for the organization of three ASEAN Food Conferences that will be held over a period of five years, from 2013 to 2017. The ASEAN Food Conference will be held once every two years. The objectives are to promote ASEAN cooperation in food science and technology, update scientists on the development and progress of food technology in Member States and keep abreast of new developments in this area.
 
The ASEAN Food Conference (AFC) was first held in Singapore in 1982 and has since become a joint activity of the ASEAN Committee on Science and Technology (ASEAN COST) and the Federation of Food Science and Technology Institutes in ASEAN (FIFSTA). After Singapore, the conference was held in Philippines in 1985, Thailand in 1988, Indonesia in 1992, Malaysia in 1994, Singapore in 1997, Philippines in 2000, Vietnam in 2003, Indonesia in 2005, Malaysia in 2007, Brunei in 2009 and Thailand in 2011. 
 
An ASEAN country that also has an Institute of Food Science and Technology in their country, and is a member of FIFSTA, holds it every 2 or 3 years. Within ASEAN COST, the Sub Committee on Food Science and Technology (ASCFST) consisting of the National Focal Points of the 10 ASEAN members is instrumental to advise on the organization of the AFC as the project is under the purview of this subcommittee.
 
For more info:
 
 

Food Safety Summit Expo & Conference 2015 in Baltimore, USA (28-30 April 2015)

 
For more info:
 

3rd World of Food Safety Conference in Bangkok, Thailand (21-22 May 2015)



For more info:

http://www.worldoffoodasia.com/index.php?q=3rd-world-food-safety-conference

Sunday, 5 April 2015

Monday Blues??Ok..Here's How You Can Be Happier Employee!!Hmm..Maybe


10 Shortcomings of SWOT Analysis by David Patrishkoff

 
If you think that the analysis you use to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) in your business is adequate, beware. It is intended to provide a 360-degree view of your risks and opportunities but often fails to fill that requirement because of superficial applications and failure to look at risks from connected systems.
 
If your risk and opportunity analysis techniques are lacking, you could be very unprepared for the next recession, disruptive technology or game-changing way of thinking that could soon affect you.
 
Too often, the last domino that struck in the last crisis is the main focus of all future risk-mitigation efforts. The whole string of triggers and threatening signals that led up to that last publicized tipping point and bursting bubble are ignored.
 
Here are the 10 most common shortcomings for SWOT analysis:
  • Underestimating the role that vertical and lateral cascading human factors can play and having fragile back-up plans
  • Absence of war gaming, stress testing and disruptive failure mode analysis testing of your leadership mindset, strategy, work culture, processes, products and services
  • Lack of focus on disruptive innovations; you respond to them but do not create them with proven innovation-on-demand techniques
  • Assumptions that cyber security and patents are safe, so they aren’t stress tested with advanced cyber-circumvention and patent-busting techniques
  • “Taboo talk rules”; uncomfortable discussion topics are avoided or not identified with focused and anonymously solicited inputs from employees
  • Ignoring “Trojan horse” risks that are secretly lurking in the hearts and minds of your employees or piggy-backing on purchased technology, software, products or services
  • Lack of use of “gamification” techniques to address the most sensitive threats in a disciplined, humane, engaging and effective manner
  • Failure to include effective strategies to attract and retain key human talent
  • Failure to identify low-profile threats that create unstoppable cascading risks — from leadership to culture to processes to bad performance to weak responses to critical situations
  • Lack of use of external perspectives to challenge group-think assumptions of perceived safety and robustness
 Simple SWOT analysis and risk-management techniques will not offer the protection required to survive the next economic crisis or disruptive technology. KISS concepts (keep it simple, stupid) have lost their ability to identify and protect against complex cascading risks. The world is a fragile, hyper-connected and cascading system full of surprises that will punish casual optimists and reward those who hope for the best but seriously plan for worst-case scenarios.
 
The World Economic Forum’s 2014 World Risk Report describes the global risks that can quietly cascade across borders and affect organizations in unsuspecting and surprising ways from a variety of threatening and linked factors. The complex dynamics that exist between developed, developing and emerging world markets is further complicated by the fact that many organizations know very little about the cascading system dynamics within their own four walls.
 
 Classic methods that attempt to describe the risk and opportunity landscape for individuals and organizations have not kept pace with the rising complexity and interactions between highly networked workplaces, global economies and internal and external threats. We have now entered a new era where we need new ways to describe and understand the complex world we have created, which has outgrown the simple tools we like to describe it with. -
 
See more at
 

Why Opportunity Youth is the Focus of Starbucks 5th Annual Global Month of Service

April is a month when Starbucks invites partners (employees) and customers to join together in community service projects around the world.  As Starbucks fifth annual Global Month of Service begins, chief community officer Blair Taylor shares the following essay on  why service is an important part of Starbucks commitment to encouraging greater understanding and compassion toward the issues impacting young people in our communities.
 
For more info: